Klimaforskning - hjemmeside
Startet av Jostemikk, mai 30, 2012, 20:00:45 PM
Sitat fra: Obelix på juni 13, 2013, 11:15:41 AMNå har jeg lest Nyhetsspeilets artikkel. Det er en del ting som er en smule feil, som de har fart over med harelabb. Men andre ting er mer interessant. Bildet av hullet i Pentagon er avslørende. Hvor er vingene? Ikke noe som helst merke, eller spor etter vinger. De er montert på den aller sterkeste delen av flyet, hvor det er aller mest av aluminiumsbjelker for a lage den kraftige "basen" for vingene. Derfor burde veggen ha hatt synlige merker etter vingene, og det burde vært diverse materialer rett ved hullet, på utsiden etter vingene. Men, den offisielle forklaringen er at vingene kom seg inn gjennom dette hullet og inn i bygningen er rett og slett ikke troverdig.Discovery Channel (tror jeg, eller Nat. Geo. CH.) viste et timesprogram om flyet som fløy inn i Pentagon. Vi ser Donald Rumsfeld i overvåkningsbildene som heroisk hjelpearbeider etter kræsjen. Disse overvåkningsbildene har ingen glipper, men overvåkningskameraet som viste flyet foran bygningen rett før kollisjonen har en såpass stor glippe at man ser ikke selve kollisjonen og det at hele flyet forsvinner inn i hullet. Neste "frame" i den overvåkningsfilmen viser at flyet er borte... Merkelig hvordan det ene overvåkningskameraet ved Pentagon er sååå dårlig, mens et annet ikke viser disse glippene - manglende "frames".Nei, dette fortoner seg mer og mer som en Hollywood-produksjon, jamfør den interessante filmen "Wag the dog".
Sitat fra: Obelix på juni 13, 2013, 11:15:41 AMNå har jeg lest Nyhetsspeilets artikkel. Det er en del ting som er en smule feil, som de har fart over med harelabb. Men andre ting er mer interessant. Bildet av hullet i Pentagon er avslørende. Hvor er vingene? Ikke noe som helst merke, eller spor etter vinger.
Sitat fra: Jostemikk på juni 13, 2013, 11:44:06 AMDet er ikke vanskeligere å sette folk på sporet enn å nevne at Pentagon er antatt å være verdens mest videoovervåkede bygning. Ikke et eneste opptak av "flyet" har blitt fremlagt. Så sier da også Pilotene for 911-sannhet at ingen av dem, til tross for at de har vært jagerflygere og rutefly-piloter i mange år at ingen av dem ville vært i nærheten av å klare å manøvrere et rutefly slik den offisielle forklaringen påstår ble gjort. Av en huleterrorist fra Midtøsten med to flytimer i en liten enmotors Cesna...
Sitat fra: Obelix på juni 13, 2013, 13:56:58 PMFor meg er dette en gåte! Hvordan kan vingene komme seg inn i bygget når hullet som ble lagd ikke viser tegn til merker etter vingene?
Sitat fra: Spiren på juni 16, 2013, 20:06:26 PMFrankrig tidligere udenrigsminister Dumas: krig mod Syrien var planlagt længe.Tidliger udenrigsminister Roland Dumas: krigen mod Syrien var planlagt to år før det "arabiske forår".Tidligere NATO Commander Wesley Clark rapporterer. at han i Pentagon november 2001 hørte om krigene mod Syrien, Libanon, Iran, Somalia og Sudan.http://cooptv.wordpress.com/2013/06/16/frankreich-ehemaliger-ausenminister-dumas-krieg-gegen-syrien-von-langer-hand-geplant/
SitatEvan Solomon: We've heard something quite extraordinary - could be a coincidence or not - that your firm, on the very day that the bombs went off in London, were running an exercise simulating three bombs going off, in the very same tube stations that they went off. How did this happen? Coincidence, or were you acting on information that you knew?Peter Power: I don't think you could say that we had some special insight into the terrorist network, otherwise I would be under arrest myself. The truth of it is -Solomon: But it is a coincidence.Power: It's a coincidence, and it's a spooky coincidence. Our scenario was very similar - it wasn't totally identical, but it was based on bombs going off, to the time, the locations, all this sort of stuff. But it wasn't an accident, in the sense that London has a history of bombs, and the reason why our emergency services did so well, and prepared probably better than any other city in the world, sadly they have to be. So it wasn't exactly rocket science or totally out of the pale to come up with that scenario unusual though it be to stop the exercise and go into real time, and it worked very well, although there was a few seconds when the audience didn't realise whether it was real or not.
SitatPOWER: Today we were running an exercise for a company - bearing in mind I'm now in the private sector - and we sat everybody down, in the city - 1,000 people involved in the whole organisation - but the crisis team. And the most peculiar thing was, we based our scenario on the simultaneous attacks on an underground and mainline station. So we had to suddenly switch an exercise from 'fictional' to 'real'. And one of the first things is, get that bureau number, when you have a list of people missing, tell them. And it took a long time - INTERVIEWER: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario? POWER: Er, almost precisely. I was up to 2 oclock this morning, because it's our job, my own company. Visor Consultants, we specialise in helping people to get their crisis management response. How do you jump from 'slow time' thinking to 'quick time' doing? And we chose a scenario - with their assistance - which is based on a terrorist attack because they're very close to, er, a property occupied by Jewish businessmen, they're in the city, and there are more American banks in the city than there are in the whole of New York - a logical thing to do. And it, I've still got the hair....
SitatMichael F. Scheuer (born 1952) is a former CIA intelligence officer, American blogger, historian, foreign policy critic, and political analyst. He is currently an adjunct professor at Georgetown University's Center for Peace and Security Studies and an Expert at Wikistrat. In his 22-year career, he served as the Chief of the Bin Laden Issue Station (aka "Alec Station"), from 1996 to 1999, the Osama bin Laden tracking unit at the Counterterrorist Center. He then worked again as Special Advisor to the Chief of the bin Laden unit from September 2001 to November 2004.
SitatJournalist Michael Hastings died in a car crash in Los Angeles early Tuesday at the age of 33, according to a statement from his employer, BuzzFeed.Hastings, who was also a contributing editor at Rolling Stone, was perhaps best known for his candid Rolling Stone interview with General Stanley McChrystal, then the commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, that eventually led to McChrystal being relieved of his command. He was also the author of two books about America's wars: The Operators, detailing the flaws of the U.S. military operation in Afghanistan, and I Lost My Love In Baghdad, about his experiences as a war correspondent in Iraq during his mid-twenties.
SitatSeks pensionerede efterforskere bryder tavsheden i opsigtsvækkende dokumentar om mystisk flyulykke. Undersøgelser fra den amerikanske havarikommission (NTSB) konkluderede imidlertid, at styrtet blev forårsaget af en eksplosion i en halvtom brændstoftank udløst af en gnist fra et elektrisk kabel. --- Den konklusion modsiges nu af seks af de efterforskere, som var med til at granske ulykken."Jeg var overbevist om, at flyet på grund af indgangs- og udgangshullet i skroget blev skadet af en stor eksplosion udefra," siger den nu pensionerede NTSB-efterforsker James Speer i filmen.Samme konklusion leveres af de øvrige medvirkende NTSB-efterforskere, som opfordrer deres tidligere arbejdsgiver til at genåbne sagen.
SitatPutin: First Soviet government was mostly JewishRussian president says predominantly Jewish Soviet government was guided by false ideological considerations."I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish," Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow's Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.According to the official transcription of Putin's speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government "were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.
Sitat fra: seoto på juni 25, 2013, 11:16:43 AMKom over en interessant artikkel i den israelske avisen The Jerusalem Post:SitatPutin: First Soviet government was mostly JewishRussian president says predominantly Jewish Soviet government was guided by false ideological considerations."I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish," Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow's Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.According to the official transcription of Putin's speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government "were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.Det er alltid interessant å få flere bekreftelser på hva som tidligere er sagt. Som alltid: Det er veldig interessant også å lese kommentarene
SitatDuring his time at the Hoover Institution, he wrote the major study Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development (in three volumes), arguing that the West played a major role in developing the Soviet Union from its very beginnings up until the present time (1970). Sutton argued that the Soviet Union's technological and manufacturing base — which was then engaged in supplying the Viet Cong — was built by United States corporations and largely funded by US taxpayers. Steel and iron plants, the GAZ automobile factory — a Ford subsidiary, located in eastern Russia — and many other Soviet industrial enterprises were, according to Sutton, built with the help or technical assistance of the United States or US corporations. He argued further that the Soviet Union's acquisition of MIRV technology was made possible by receiving (from US sources) machining equipment for the manufacture of precision ball bearings, necessary to mass-produce MIRV-enabled missiles.In 1973, Sutton published a popularized, condensed version of the three volumes called National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union and was thereby forced out of the Hoover Institution. His conclusion from his research on the issue was that the conflicts of the Cold War were "not fought to restrain communism", since the United States, through financing the Soviet Union "directly or indirectly armed both sides in at least Korea and Vietnam"; rather, these wars were organised in order "to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts". The update to this text, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, looked at the role of technology transfers up to the 1980s. Appendix B of that text contained the text of his 1972 testimony before Subcommittee VII of the Platform Committee of the Republican Party where he summarized the essential aspects of his overall research:In a few words: there is no such thing as Soviet technology. Almost all — perhaps 90-95 percent — came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies. In effect the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union. Its industrial and its military capabilities. This massive construction job has taken 50 years. Since the Revolution in 1917. It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical assistance.Sutton's next three major published books — Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Wall Street and FDR — detailed Wall Street's involvement in the Bolshevik Revolution (in order to destroy Russia as an economic competitor and turn it into "a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control") as well as its decisive contributions to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose policies he assessed as being essentially the same, namely "corporate socialism" planned by the big corporations. Sutton concluded that this was all part of the economic power elites' "long-range program of nurturing collectivism" and fostering "corporate socialism" in order to ensure "monopoly acquisition of wealth", because it "would fade away if it were exposed to the activity of a free market". In his view, the only solution to prevent such abuse in the future was that "a majority of individuals declares or acts as if it wants nothing from government, declares it will look after its own welfare and interests", or specifically that "a majority finds the moral courage and the internal fortitude to reject the something-for-nothing con game and replace it by voluntary associations, voluntary communes, or local rule and decentralized societies". In Sutton's own words he was "persecuted but never prosecuted" for his research and subsequent publication of his findings.
SitatFor impressive evidence of Western participation in the early phase of Soviet economic growth, see Antony C. Sutton's Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1917–1930, which argues that 'Soviet economic development for 1917–1930 was essentially dependent on Western technological aid' (p.283), and that 'at least 95 per cent of the industrial structure received this assistance.
SitatSutton comes to conclusions that are uncomfortable for many businessmen and economists. For this reason his work tends to be either dismissed out of hand as 'extreme' or, more often, simply ignored.
SitatHis work (Suttons) led him to more questions than answers. "Why had the US built-up it's enemy? Why did the US build-up the Soviet Union, while we also transferred technology to Hitler's Germany? Why does Washington want to conceal these facts?"...Hitler's economic policies were OK'd by the bankers right through the war...ITT, Chase, Texaco and others were operating in Nazi-held France as late as 1945. In fact Chase in Paris was trying to get Nazi accounts as late as 1944. When we got to Germany in May 1945, I remember seeing a (bombed-out) Woolworth store in Hamburg and thinking, "What's Woolworth doing in Nazi Germany?" While we were bombed and shelled it was "business as usual" for Big Business.
SitatJournalisten Michael (33) sendte bekymrings-e-post om at han «ble overvåket», bare timer før han døde.- Jeg er på sporet av en stor sak, og må ligge lavt.