Klimaforskning - hjemmeside
Startet av Amatør1, september 27, 2013, 20:50:32 PM
Sitat fra: Bebben på september 27, 2013, 22:20:42 PMImponerende av Kerry å si at "vitenskapen er tydeligere og mer overbevisende enn før". Hvordan har han både lest og fordøyd den vitenskapelige rapporten før den er tilgjengelig? Han har vel knapt rukket å lese den politiske delen? Men OK, når jeg tenker over det så fortalte jo Pachauri allerede for 5-6 år siden hva konklusjonene i denne rapporten skulle være, lenge før den vitenskapen som skulle bekrefte dem var publisert.
SitatThe whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.H. L. Mencken
SitatUN IPCC Exhumes, Brings Climate Catastrophe Back From The Grave...Politicians, Activists Dancing Like It's 2007!Today the German and international media, politicians and activists are all in a celebratory mood - the climate catastrophe is back after all. It's real and approaching faster than ever. The UN just certified it! Climate activists are in a state of euphoria again – they're out dancing in the streets – there hasn't been such a feeling since 2007. It's climate Oktoberfest for the alarmists.[...]Let the alarmists have their day. In the end we all know it isn't going to last long at all. You can dig up a corpse, clean it up, dress it, and parade it through town claiming it's alive. But in reality it's a lifeless, rotting and ghoulish cadaver, and it's not ever going to be coming back to life.AR5 is the IPCC's Order of AGW Exhumation. The alarmists are now parading the corpse, pretending it's alive and in ruddy health.But AGW science is dead, and has been so 15 years. It's not taking a nap, it's not passed out, it's not even breathing. It's long deceased. The UN IPCC and climate activists refuse to come to terms with that.
Sitat fra: Jostemikk på september 27, 2013, 22:37:06 PMFlott du startet denne, Amatør1. Skal få overført utenlandsavdelingen jeg flyttet inn i den andre tråden med.
SitatFra WUWT: M Courtney says September 27, 2013 at 5:19 amI looked at the BBC News website for their post Most Popular news stories at 13:13 today.The end of the world was only number 6.1: Kanye West angry at Radio 1 parody2: Goodbye, US passport3: Two plead not guilty to Rigby murder4: The man who may have saved the world5: Cameron says no to Salmond TV debate6: Global warming now 'unequivocal'7: Spain to consider time zone change8: Quiz of the week's news9: Is Breaking Bad's Walter White one of TV's truly evil characters?10: New Syria chemical attacks probedNo-one cares anymore...
SitatGlobal Warming Slowdown Seen as Emissions Rise to RecordGlobal warming has slowed since 1998 as pollution reached a record and the threat of rising oceans increased, a United Nations panel said in a report that hardened attitudes on both sides of the climate debate.The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said the temperature has been increasing at less than half the longer-term average since 1951.
Sitathttp://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ipcc-principles/ipcc-principles.pdfPRINCIPLES GOVERNING IPCC WORKApproved at the Fourteenth Session (Vienna, 1-3 October 1998) on 1 October 1998, amended atthe Twenty-First Session (Vienna, 3 and 6-7 November 2003), the Twenty-Fifth Session(Mauritius, 26-28 April 2006) and the Thirty-Fifth Session (Geneva, 6-9 June 2012)ROLE2. The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation. IPCC reports should be neutral with respect to policy, although they may need to deal objectively with scientific, technical and socio-economic factors relevant to the application of particular policies.
SitatClimate change: a political report[..]Needless to say, in what was now become the typical media manipulation, the actual report is not available until Monday. This means that the message gets the full airing, before anyone has the opportunity to analyse the evidence, thus ensuring that the approved line gets a head start on the opposition - with the willing help of the BBC.One has to note that, if the authors of the report were confident of their data, they might not need to indulge in such a high degree of media manipulation . But then, the IPPC reports have always been more media events than they have been the exposition of science.Watts Up With That, however, suggests that the IPCC should have just copied and pasted the AR4 summary onto the AR5 letterhead, and save the world tens of billions of dollars.In a way, that really sums it up. The document is actually a summary for believers. Those who believe will continue to believe. Those who do not will continue to disbelieve. The two sides are irreconcilable, and there is now no longer any debate. They talk past each other, while the uncommitted look at the contest with a mixture of tedium, indifference and dismay.What should be noted though, is that the IPCC is, by definition, a propaganda operation. Its self-defined role is, "to assess ... the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation".The organisation, by its own account, takes as a given the existence of "human-induced climate change" and, therefore, it is entirely unsurprising that it finds: "human influence on climate clear". It could do nothing else. [..]The only thing, therefore, one needs to say of this AR5 is that it is a political statement by a politically motivated body, made for political reasons. And if you need to know the basis of the politics, start with Rio in 1992 and Agenda 21.