Verdensbanken skjuler CO2-handelens kollaps i 2012

Startet av Amatør1, juli 10, 2013, 16:44:29 PM

« forrige - neste »

Amatør1

Joanne Nova har et meget viktig og lesverdig innlegg på bloggen sin, der hun forteller at verdensbankens årlige rapport "The State and Trends of the Carbon Market" som kommer hvert år i Mai/Juni - ikke er å finne i år. Årsaken er at verdensbanken slett ikke rapporterer objektivt om trender, de pusher CO2-handel for alt det er verdt, og når CO2-børsene kollapser så feies rapporteringen under teppet, man rapporterer simpelthen ikke.

SitatState of the carbon market in 2013 is so sick the World Bank cancelled the report

ach year  for nearly a decade The World Bank has published "The State and Trends of the Carbon Market" in May or June with great fan-fare and press releases. It's the definitive guide telling the world how many dollars are turning over in the global markets (which really means "the EU market plus a few other bits"). I've been quoting their figures for years — The 2012 report told us that $176 billion dollars turned over in 2011. So what was the number for the 2012 year? Whatever it is, it's so bad the World Bank cancelled the report.



Figure what the cancellation of the report tells us about the The World Bank. Was it publishing these figures for the last nine years because they were important for investors and policy-makers? I guess not, or they would still be publishing them. By dropping it at the first major downturn, we know the reason for the report was pure PR, something for whipping up momentum about the market and getting headlines in newspapers. The numbers in 2013 became a PR disadvantage — the World Bank did not want headlines like "carbon market collapses", or "carbon trading falls by 50%" (or whatever the figure is). So the report had to go.

Tenk litt over dette i lys av Jostemikk sine analyser om hvem som styrer med hvilke modler i verden idag.

Les det hele hos Joanne Nova.

SitatWhy would the World Bank be interested in promoting fear of man-made emissions? Could it be that they manage millions of dollars of funds and facilities, all of which would be pointless if man-made emissions are not a catastrophe waiting-to-happen.
It is easier to lie to someone than to convince them, that they have been lied to

Jostemikk

Joanne Nova har forstått mye av hvordan verden er nagla sammen. Sannsynligvis forstår hun mer enn hun gir uttrykk for. Hun har også forsøkt sette fokus på hvem som eier "alt", blant annet mainstream media.

Jeg håper alle ser nøye på den grafen Amatør1 linket. Det er ikke bare siste års fraværende tall som er det interessante. Se hvor mye penger dette har dreid seg om de siste årene. Geniale mennesker. Fullstendig skruppelløse, men geniale.
Ja heldigvis flere der ser galskapen; men stadig alt for få.
Dertil kommer desværre de der ikke vil se, hva de ser.

Spiren