Klimaforskning - hjemmeside
Startet av Gloføken, november 05, 2011, 14:31:56 PM
SitatLysenkoisme i våre dagerTrofim Lysenko (1898-1976), russisk biolog, klarte å overtale politikerne, og ikke minst Stalin, til å støtte hans pseudoforskning i ca. 30 år. Først etter at Krustsjov kom til makten i 1953 ble det igjen mulig å kritisere Lysenkos "forskning". I hans glansperiode kunne det til og med være dødelig å være motstander, og man mistet i hvert fall all ære og jobbmuligheter.I 1964 sa Andrei Sakharov følgende om Lysenko: "He is responsible for the shameful backwardness of Soviet biology and of genetics in particular, for the dissemination of pseudo-scientific views, for adventurism, for the degradation of learning, and for the defamation, firing, arrest, even death, of many genuine scientists."I dag ser vi at det samme skjer innenfor klimaforskning, et felt hvor det er politisk konsensus som styrer. Dette blir klart bevist gjennom den behandlingen den høyt respekterte svenske klimaforskeren Lennart Bengtsson har blitt møtt med etter at han klart sa fra om at klimaskremslene var sterkt overdrevet. Dessverre er det ingen spøk å gå imot politisk konsensus, da spiller selv ikke reell forskning noen rolle.
SitatThe Bullying of Bengtsson and the Coming Climate Disruption Hypocalypse[...] That climate models do NOT provide good forecasts with demonstrable skill should concern everyone. But as Bengtsson has found out, a scientist advertises this fact at their peril.Bengtsson has always been a little skeptical, as all good scientists should be. After all, most published science ends up being wrong anyway.But once he became more outspoken about his skepticism, well...that's just unacceptable for someone of his stature. That his treatment should lead him to worry about his health and his safety tells us a lot about just how politicized global warming research has become.This bad behavior by the climate science community is nothing new. It's been going on for at least 20 years. [min uth.]I have talked to established climate scientists who are afraid to say anything about their skepticism. In hushed tones, they admit they have to skew the wording of papers and proposals to not appear to be one of those "denier" types.At least in the U.S., politicians are the ones who started this mess — Eisenhower predicted "public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite" — and they have the power to put an end to it. [min uth.]They started it by purposely funding research that had the ultimate goal of increasing the power and influence of government over the private sector by accomplishing favored regulatory goals. Agency heads who are political appointees installed managers under them who would be team players. I've told the story of meeting with V.P. Gore's environmental science adviser in the early 1990s who confided that, now that they had successfully regulated the manufacture of CFCs, carbon dioxide was next. The IPCC was being formed to make that happen, by enlisting scientists who would be guided by politicians and government representatives. [min uth.]This is no conspiracy theory. This was mostly done out in the open, for all to see. [...]
SitatAlecM said:This 40+ year scam starting in 1975 at the 'Endangered Atmosphere' conference when old and new Eugenicists, the latter associated with the Club of Rome financed by the Rockefellers, decided to use the CO2 scare to force politics to the stage we are in now.A quid pro quo was to subvert science. A group of scientists who until then had been forecasting a new ice age, switched to extract federal funds. IPCC co-founder Houghton used an already discredited route to atmospheric physics [based on a mathematical mistake by Milne in 1928] to claim the GHE was lapse rate heating, the compression of all gases by gravity which causes most temperature rise in our atmosphere.I suspect he did this for two reasons. The first is that it was plausible in the absence of any other explanation of post-ice age warming. The second is that his strong religious views made him want to predict Armageddon: his influence on Thatcher was immense.For proof see 1981_Hansen_etal.pdf which put this false science into the US literature. Then assuming 33 K present GHE and a ~7 fold increase in IR warming, a perpetual motion machine, Gore and Lay of Enron used Hansen to persuade the politicians there was a serious problem, when the physics had been faked.Thus climate science has been a commercial scam for 24+ years with the likes of GS using it to create a way to tax the population, a new commodity with absolutely no warming potential.The science part was to make a totally unwarranted assumption that the Earth emits IR radiation as if a black body in a vacuum, with half the imaginary radiative energy from the perpetual motion machine transferred to increased atmospheric temperature in an iterative process, picking up imaginary water vapour from the oceans, hence imaginary positive feedback. Part of the energy comes from the top because of incorrect IR absorption physics.Unfortunately for the scammers, in 1997, research overturned the assumption that CO2 followed T at the end of ice ages. So, they decided to use scientific fraud to keep the conspiracy going. It seems Mann strong-armed Briffa in the 1999 IPCC meeting in Tanzania to change tree ring assessment to hide the warming in mediaeval times. However, this made post 1960 temperatures decrease - 'the decline', which was hidden..In 2004, NASA/GISS switched the accepted aerosol optical physics of Twomey with fake physics to claim the imaginary warming had been hidden by mostly polluted cloud cooling - 'Global Dimming'. They even now claim all the warming is hidden.To be fair, this bunch of scientific shysters is splitting as some try to restore seriously dented reputations. The CRU people were protected by the fake Oxburgh Report, really to protect the investments of the Mafia who own the windmill corporations. But as they near retirement, reputations are apparently more important – Briffa has recently recreated the MWP.But the ultimate irony is that all along the hidden mistake these people made was an elementary failure to understand heat transfer which all process engineers immediately see. The Earth cannot emit radiative energy as if it were an isolated black body in a vacuum. This is because basic radiative physics from 1884 means the IR generated thermally in the atmosphere turns off that emission from the surface. Hence the present temperature plateau is because of solar effects and we're heading into a new Little Ice Age.The large number of CO2 religionists means they are fighting like rats in a sack to protect the grants, aided by governments led by unprincipled politicians doing the bidding of the carbon traders, who include energy companies like Shell wanting to crash economies to earn money from taxing the poor as they freeze.A truly evil part of the problem has been the conversion of environmental charities like the WWF into corporate troughers. Greenpeace is basically a front for the old Soviet Union which was to enslave Europe by hooking us onto Gazprom natural gas to power the CCGTs that produce virtually all the so-called 'free' windmill power. The FoE and Christian Aid are also deeply compromised.To counter these disgraceful people we need total openness about the science so the voters can judge for themselves how they have been deceived. Unfortunately, the likes of Cameron and Davey, our privately-educated elite put into power by the carbon traders, are almost totally committed because they were indoctrinated when young. Therefore we need to go to the older generation who are still objective and uncompromised.
SitatNo need to worry about Greenland's waterslidesWe've had a new study published about the slippery slopes of Greenland. If we're right they're not as slippery – and therefore as worrying – as we first thought.Greenland's ice sheet is not simply a giant ice cube, inert but for gradual erosion from climate change. It's a dynamic, shifting landscape, a place of delicate balance between the forces that create ice and those that destroy it. Under its own immense weight, ice flows continuously towards the coasts and is lost whenever icebergs break off into the sea, or when the surface is warm enough to melt or sublimate. Ice is constantly replaced as falling snow compacts, or rain and meltwater freeze....
SitatIsen nekter å gi slipp i sommersola ved badestrandhttp://www.abcnyheter.no/video/2014/06/02/isen-nekter-gi-slipp-i-sommersola-ved-badestrandautoplay=1
SitatThis is probably the best interview from a geologist on climate change that I have read for a long while. My highest respect for Prof. Schlüchter." Fritz Vahrenholt calls it "impressive.
SitatAs we finish up our new Version 6 of the UAH dataset, it looks like our anomalies in the 2nd half of the satellite record will be slightly cooler, somewhat more like the RSS dataset....but we are talking small adjustments here...hundredths of a deg. C.