Skremselspropaganda i utlandet

[BorisA]

Lurer på om jeg skal kose meg med en klimaskrekkfilm.
Har to åvelge mellom.
1) En ubehagelig sannhet v / Al Gore
2) The day after tomorrow

Burde bli laget flere av disse.

[ebye]

Velg heller: The day before tomorrwo, så er du forberedt!

[seoto]

Lurer på om jeg skal kose meg med en klimaskrekkfilm.
Har to åvelge mellom.
1) En ubehagelig sannhet v / Al Gore
2) The day after tomorrow

Burde bli laget flere av disse.

Det burde snart lages en "An Inconvenient Truth II" - dedikert til Al Gore og IPCC

[seoto]

Etter hvert som årene går, ser vi at flere og flere av spådommene til IPCC og deres forskere blir gjort til skamme.
I England/Wales ble de lovet følgende:

Noting that "the IPCC projections set the framework for the coastal policy response to sea-level rise in England and Wales," which was developed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF, 1991), Lee says it was widely predicted that the expected relative sea-level rise (RSLR) would result in an increase in wave energy at the base of coastal cliffs that would lead to accelerated cliff recession that "inevitably would lead to increased risk to properties behind actively retreating cliff-lines," adding that Bray and Hooke (1997) suggested that "significant increases in recession rate could be expected to occur," as their analysis pointed towards "a 22-133% increase in cliff recession rates on the south coast of England by 2050."

Og hvordan står det så til nå, ca. 20 år senere?

In a candid expression of his feelings after conducting his analysis, Lee writes that "as someone who was heavily involved in providing technical support to policymakers through the research and development of methods for predicting cliff recession that took account of RSLR (see Lee et al., 2001; Hall et al., 2000; Lee and Clark, 2002; Lee, 2005), I feel somewhat awkward about the absence of accelerated cliff recession over the last two decades," acknowledging that "perhaps we were all too keen to accept the unquestioned authority of the IPCC and their projections." Thus, he ends by stating "I am left with the feeling that a healthy skepticism of the climate change industry might not be such a bad thing," suggesting that people see, in this regard, the report of the Nongovernmental Panel on Climate Change that was edited by Idso and Singer (2009). [Min uthevning]

Når man ser bort fra det som er naturlige klimaendringer, som skifter lokalt, hva er da tilbake av alle spådommene?




I samme forbindelse kan jeg nevne at denne rapporten nå kan lastes ned:

Climate Change
Reconsidered
2011 Interim Report
Lead Authors
Craig D. Idso (USA), Robert M. Carter (Australia), S. Fred Singer (USA)

[Bebben]

Sjokknyheter midt i snopetiden:

"Sjokolade vil bli en dyr luksus på grunn av klimaendringer"

I henhold til "en ny studie", selvfølgelig. Interessant at den er gjort på oppdrag av Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Skal tro om Bill Gates visste at sjokolademangel allerede står på John Brignells "warmlist" over alle ting som skyldes global oppvarming klimaendringer klimaforstyrrelser?

Uansett, når man leser at kakaodyrkerne i Vest-Afrika tjener 80 cent om dagen på hardt arbeid og lever til de er 56, er det jo kanskje en mulighet for at sjokoladen er for billig som det er. Eller kanskje det bare er noen andre som har taket på dem og stikker av med litt for mye av gryna.

Men vi får tro at enkelte bekymrede sjokoladeelskere nå vil kreve umiddelbare tiltak i form av fjerning av sukkeravgift økte bensinpriser. 

[ConTrari]

Sjokknyheter midt i snopetiden:

"Sjokolade vil bli en dyr luksus på grunn av klimaendringer"

I henhold til "en ny studie", selvfølgelig. Interessant at den er gjort på oppdrag av Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Skal tro om Bill Gates visste at sjokolademangel allerede står på John Brignells "warmlist" over alle ting som skyldes global oppvarming klimaendringer klimaforstyrrelser?

Uansett, når man leser at kakaodyrkerne i Vest-Afrika tjener 80 cent om dagen på hardt arbeid og lever til de er 56, er det jo kanskje en mulighet for at sjokoladen er for billig som det er. Eller kanskje det bare er noen andre som har taket på dem og stikker av med litt for mye av gryna.

Men vi får tro at enkelte bekymrede sjokoladeelskere nå vil kreve umiddelbare tiltak i form av fjerning av sukkeravgift økte bensinpriser. 

Ser ut fra kommentarene at denne artikkelen er et rent copy-and-paste verk, de legger ved linker til en drøss andre nettsteder med samme innhold. Verdt å lese! De levner ikke lille Lulu mye ære.

Og denne er en liten Durban-juvel:

"Louise.. an update on what was accomplished at Durban.   15,000 bloated bureaucrats managed to put together a plan, to plan a process which will lead to increasing the ambition for enhanced action, and to plan to plan a process which will lead to a protocol vision to be completed by someone, sometime between now and 2015.   This plan to plan these processes will be finalized later in 2012 when a meeting -yet to be planned - which will initiate this phase of the planning process. At that time things will really get rolling on the plan to plan the process which will yield a protocol or, more likely a protocol plan, but at least a process for developing a protocol plan.

hmmm ... sounds really like they have taken this bull by the horns!  "

Og her er sjokoladetrøsten for de nervøse:

"Lu.. seems as though cacao beans are grown pretty much throughout the entire tropical region of the world with significant quantities being produced in 20 nations.  But, get this..  since just 1983, production of cocoa has doubled, even as the world has warmed.   And, that doubling has come about because ... as the price of cacao went up... guess what happened?   More acres of cacao trees were planted.   Now who would think that the dirty old capitalists might ride in to save the poor cacao trees from extinction?"

Og hvem er dette? Noen som melder seg?:

"midwest norwegian

Yesterday 04:30 PM
And something like 80% of all statistics are made-up on the spot."

[Jostemikk]

Og denne er en liten Durban-juvel:

"Louise.. an update on what was accomplished at Durban.   15,000 bloated bureaucrats managed to put together a plan, to plan a process which will lead to increasing the ambition for enhanced action, and to plan to plan a process which will lead to a protocol vision to be completed by someone, sometime between now and 2015.   This plan to plan these processes will be finalized later in 2012 when a meeting -yet to be planned - which will initiate this phase of the planning process. At that time things will really get rolling on the plan to plan the process which will yield a protocol or, more likely a protocol plan, but at least a process for developing a protocol plan.

hmmm ... sounds really like they have taken this bull by the horns!  "

Dette var et gullkorn. Klimabyråkratiet forklart på en god måte. Når det går penger og politikk i en sak...

[BorisA]

På nyåret starter NRK en ny BBC-serie med tittelen "Ei iskald verd".
Litt av spenningen her er hvor mye klima-alarmisme de klarer å putte inn i serien.
For de har vel ikke sluttet med det?

[Amatør1]

Har dere ikke fulgt med, gutter?    Du tenker på den serien der siste episode har scener fra en tysk dyrehage uten at det opplyses?

Jeg mener å ha lest at den siste episoden ikke vises i USA pga. dette. Vi kunne kanskje legge litt press på NrK og be dem velge bort denne episoden?

WUWT: More ursus bogus – this time with fake snow on BBC's "Frozen Planet"

Monday, 12 December 2011 17:48 Euan Stretch, Daily Mirror

Frozen Planet's eight million devoted fans will not take kindly to being left out in the cold. It emerged yesterday a key scene from the hit BBC series showing a polar bear tending her newborn cubs was filmed in a zoo using fake snow.

Mixing real Arctic shots with zoo scenes, documentary makers fooled the audience into believing the footage was gathered by intrepid cameramen in the brutal sub-zero wilderness.

It was actually filmed from the comfort of a wildlife park enclosure using bears in a man-made wood den.

During the carefully worded Frozen Planet commentary, Sir David Attenborough's script failed to explain how the moving scene was made.

Frozen Planet Faked? David Attenborough Explains 'We Did It For The Polar Bears'

Sir David Attenborough has weighed into the Frozen Planet row to defend the use of footage of polar bear cubs which was not filmed in the Arctic, but in a German zoo.

Fans of the BBC documentary were outraged to learn that the ice nest where polar bears were filmed was a man-made, and that commentary by "national treasure" Attenborough was carefully scripted to avoid making explicit references to the cub's birthplace.

The birth of the polar cubs was a magical centrepiece to episode five of Frozen Planet, with viewers invited into the womb of ice where "the newest polar bears in the world" were seen snow white and blinking.

The BBC defended its treatment of the footage, with the show's producer Kathryn Jeffs explaining that it was both impractical and dangerous to film the polar bears inside the ice nest.

Aardvark David Attenborough The Warming Alarmist

The final episode of Frozen Planet, probably the finest Natural History documentary ever made was a sad occasion, sad because David Attenborough, the face of Natural History to millions of people ceased to be that, instead, losing all objectivity Attenborough produced a program that is in line with the BBC's one sided view on Anthropogenic Global Warming.

[jarlgeir]

Contrari:

Det finnes informasjon fra folk i kakaobransjen om sjokolademangelen.

Det er simpelthen så enkelt som vanskjøtsel av de aller fleste kakaofarmene i Vestafrika. De fleste trærne ble plantet i kolonitiden. Trærne har nå blitt for gamle og yter derfor ikke samme avling lengre. På samme måte som farfars plommetrær ble for gamle og sluttet å bære plommer.....

I Latinamerika er det til sammenligning ingen tegn til svikt i sjokoladeavlingene.

[seoto]

I Latinamerika er det til sammenligning ingen tegn til svikt i sjokoladeavlingene.

Det er betryggende å høre for oss norske, siden vi smaksmessig foretrekker de Latin-Amerikanske kakaobønnene

[seoto]

Nå er vi inne i 2012, og det skulle jo være det året da det er for sent å gjøre noe?

New York Times - 18 nov 2007

Alarming UN report on climate change too rosy, many say
[...] The IPCC chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, an engineer and economist from India, acknowledged the new trajectory. "If there's no action before 2012, that's too late," Pachauri said. "What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future. This is the defining moment."

[ConTrari]

Nå er vi inne i 2012, og det skulle jo være det året da det er for sent å gjøre noe?

New York Times - 18 nov 2007

Alarming UN report on climate change too rosy, many say
[...] The IPCC chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, an engineer and economist from India, acknowledged the new trajectory. "If there's no action before 2012, that's too late," Pachauri said. "What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future. This is the defining moment."

Har du ikke sett IPCCs motto? :

"It is always almost too late."

[seoto]

Med alarmistiske aktivister som Pachauri og Hansen er det vel ikke rart at IPCC ender opp på et visst hett sted
Noen kommer til å føle seg fryktelig rundlurt en vakker dag ...

[Bebben]

OMG klimaendringene har skapt nye haier!

Världens första hajhybrider har upptäckts utanför Australiens östkust. Hybriderna kan vara en följd av klimatförändringarna, menar forskare vid ett universitet i Queensland

h/t  The Climate Scam